Linkspun.com

Hi everyone,

as we all are limited to 100 per day, 500 per week i'm thinking that we all need more advanced filtering of search trades results.

What i mean, is that that 100 requests that we can do per day has to be valuable and done from sites that you willing to get link.

so i suggest:

[*]Filter results excluding : subdomains, deep pages (example: to get only top level domain names)
[*]also to get into advanced option to exclude sites that already links to specific domain (example: exclude fuckmygf.com)
[*]Filter of last activity users (example: users that has been active only for month, week, day)

To see if site is indexed by Google or to see it Alexa rank is bit difficult to add into established system but filtering would be awesome.

Everyone should participate in this thread and tell to ownership that we need or don't this !

fully agree. It would be much more faster to find valuable links each day. Just doubt if it is easy to do.

123anddone wrote: [*]Filter of last activity users (example: users that has been active only for month, week, day)

You can already sort them by the last day they logged in.

I was gonna vote "Yes, this is necessary" but then I thought about just voting "Yes"

Then I realized that "I don't care" but got confused with how that was different than "No"

The I went back & re-read the entire post & still didn't understand, for the most part, WTF this person was talking about.

So in the end, I voted "What is linkspun ???" because that's a ROFLMAO kinda reply & I'm a ROFLMAO kinda guy

greenguy wrote:I was gonna vote "Yes, this is necessary" but then I thought about just voting "Yes"

Then I realized that "I don't care" but got confused with how that was different than "No"

The I went back & re-read the entire post & still didn't understand, for the most part, WTF this person was talking about.

So in the end, I voted "What is linkspun ???" because that's a ROFLMAO kinda reply & I'm a ROFLMAO kinda guy

I love you!

"What is linkspun??" FTW

Youre totally on the wrong track here Greenie
This is something unknown that we dont have. Its impossible to find out what it is and the only thing we know for sure is that we dont have it. We crave it, we lay awake thinking about this mysterious thing that we might get our paws on. Of course we MUST have it !

I voted NECESSARY. I can no longer live without this, whatever it is.

greenguy wrote:I was gonna vote "Yes, this is necessary" but then I thought about just voting "Yes"

Then I realized that "I don't care" but got confused with how that was different than "No"

The I went back & re-read the entire post & still didn't understand, for the most part, WTF this person was talking about.

So in the end, I voted "What is linkspun ???" because that's a ROFLMAO kinda reply & I'm a ROFLMAO kinda guy

[*]Filter results excluding : subdomains, deep pages (example: to get only top level domain names)
Think this is doable by checking Don't show multiple pages from same domain.

olexisomar wrote:[*]Filter results excluding : subdomains, deep pages (example: to get only top level domain names)
Think this is doable by checking Don't show multiple pages from same domain.

have you tried to click it ? you will see all subdomains and all those same pages will be grouped and you will have to expand them to request from main.

123anddone wrote:

olexisomar wrote:[*]Filter results excluding : subdomains, deep pages (example: to get only top level domain names)
Think this is doable by checking Don't show multiple pages from same domain.

have you tried to click it ? you will see all subdomains and all those same pages will be grouped and you will have to expand them to request from main.

Yeah... the way it is currently implemented seems broken to me also.

vrocks wrote:

123anddone wrote:

olexisomar wrote:[*]Filter results excluding : subdomains, deep pages (example: to get only top level domain names)
Think this is doable by checking Don't show multiple pages from same domain.

have you tried to click it ? you will see all subdomains and all those same pages will be grouped and you will have to expand them to request from main.

Yeah... the way it is currently implemented seems broken to me also.

Well I haven't now but this morning before I commented this trade I did test it and it worked for me. Not quiet sure if still work, hold on let me try wait just a sec ..... back it still work for me. Have you tried clicking on the link that says Display: All Pages | Single Domain just pick the one that says single domain and post your results.

here you will find two snap shoots I took after I made the above comment

as you see in your second image that you can't click request to sites that has more deep pages, you have to click on magnify and then look for main domain and then click request, instead you would just click request form it and wont see any deep pages of it.

123anddone wrote:as you see in your second image that you can't click request to sites that has more deep pages, you have to click on magnify and then look for main domain and then click request, instead you would just click request form it and wont see any deep pages of it.

I am thinking in the future this would be more AJAX like...

It would have the same function as any other time as far as the row that domain is on, but it would have a plus sign and when clicked it would expand with the extra data... But I think Drocd did it this way because some domains have 100's of pages/subdomains on them...

yes, but we still need to have filter of subdomains and deep pages. Because many of us trades only with domain names, not subdomains or deep pages of sites.

123anddone wrote:yes, but we still need to have filter of subdomains and deep pages. Because many of us trades only with domain names, not subdomains or deep pages of sites.

Cool... brain storm for me on part of it if you could...

What is the criteria for this:

http://www.google.com/
http://google.com
http://www.google.com/index.php
http://blog.google.com/

Which one is the one you want? And if I remove that one from the equation, which one after that one? ie, do either of these two stay if they are the only options for the domain?:

http://www.google.com/index.php
http://blog.google.com/

Or how about?:

http://www.google.com/blog/

Discuss...

what about a filter where i see only trades to the domain i am searching for

when i search for cams i am not interested in all trades i have done. i am only interested in the trades relatet to the one i am searching for at the moment.

vrocks wrote: Cool... brain storm for me on part of it if you could...
What is the criteria for this:
http://www.google.com/
http://google.com
http://www.google.com/index.php
http://blog.google.com/
Which one is the one you want? And if I remove that one from the equation, which one after that one? ie, do either of these two stay if they are the only options for the domain?:
http://www.google.com/index.php
http://blog.google.com/
Or how about?:
http://www.google.com/blog/
Discuss...

in result it should stay only :
http://www.google.com/
http://google2.com
-------------------------------
http://blog.google.com/ this is subdomain.
http://www.google.com/blog/ this is deep page.
http://www.googleX.com/index.php - this one is more like deep page, because users have added hundreds of pages that are similar, like: page.php, home.php that are duplicates of main domain just to make trades with.

if user would like to trade with deep pages or subdomains he/she can turn off this filter and get all sites. Or it can be vice versa to see only deep pages and subdomains for those users that don't have domains to trade with and trading with subdomains, deep pages or free hosts.