Using OSE DA instead of PR

[Arnoxxx]

Might be hard to implement, but it's been proven that it's a much more effective tool for calculating the link power of a site. Plus, it updates more often than pagerank, so potentially newer sites with 0 PR but high link power could instantly be discarded whereas a PR1 site that simply got there by random increase is suddenly epic.

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-science- ... rrelations

[jdoughs]

Might be hard to implement, but it's been proven that it's a much more effective tool for calculating the link power of a site. Plus, it updates more often than pagerank, so potentially newer sites with 0 PR but high link power could instantly be discarded whereas a PR1 site that simply got there by random increase is suddenly epic.

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-science- ... rrelations

I have plans to implement the SEOMOZ API into the site, their free API is decent and may be enough, but to increase benefits and tie into the PRO API, the minimum requirement is to pay $500/month for every 500,000 links checked, and next stage I think is $2,000 a month.

This isn't a huge amount (not really cheap either) but because of this, when we get the PRO API it will most likely be a paid feature.

[whitey]

Might be hard to implement, but it's been proven that it's a much more effective tool for calculating the link power of a site. Plus, it updates more often than pagerank, so potentially newer sites with 0 PR but high link power could instantly be discarded whereas a PR1 site that simply got there by random increase is suddenly epic.

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-science- ... rrelations

I have plans to implement the SEOMOZ API into the site, their free API is decent and may be enough, but to increase benefits and tie into the PRO API, the minimum requirement is to pay $500/month for every 500,000 links checked, and next stage I think is $2,000 a month.

This isn't a huge amount (not really cheap either) but because of this, when we get the PRO API it will most likely be a paid feature.[/quote]


Sounds like a good plan.

[jdoughs]

lol I guess its not just me who had an issue with a double quote.

I had to edit mine to get it to set right, I'll try to simplify that as well.