Linkspun.com

Is the only way to garnish deep links to individually add deep pages to our profiles?

mBishop wrote:Is the only way to garnish deep links to individually add deep pages to our profiles?

Looks that way in Linkspun. However you could also look for Links Organizer and Linkex signup pages and do deep linking that way.

Hmm... I should set up another copy of LinksOrganizer for managing trades on deep link pages...

I'm not sure I'm following, but yes to spider and track trades for deeplink pages you have to add those pages to the tool.

If we were to just spider an entire domain our url list would be a total shit pile and very difficult to search through. So we made it to not spider the entire domain and add all the pages and a user must add each URL he/she wants to trade with.

Visit your sitemap, copy a list of 100 urls, and enter them all at once. It's quite easy to load any pages you want to trade on.

jdoughs wrote:I'm not sure I'm following, but yes to spider and track trades for deeplink pages you have to add those pages to the tool.

If we were to just spider an entire domain our url list would be a total shit pile and very difficult to search through. So we made it to not spider the entire domain and add all the pages and a user must add each URL he/she wants to trade with.

Visit your sitemap, copy a list of 100 urls, and enter them all at once. It's quite easy to load any pages you want to trade on.

The problem is, until there is a better way to search/limit/group/tag pages, having a massive list of 10,000 pages for deep linking isn't feasible.

mBishop wrote:

jdoughs wrote:I'm not sure I'm following, but yes to spider and track trades for deeplink pages you have to add those pages to the tool.

If we were to just spider an entire domain our url list would be a total shit pile and very difficult to search through. So we made it to not spider the entire domain and add all the pages and a user must add each URL he/she wants to trade with.

Visit your sitemap, copy a list of 100 urls, and enter them all at once. It's quite easy to load any pages you want to trade on.

The problem is, until there is a better way to search/limit/group/tag pages, having a massive list of 10,000 pages for deep linking isn't feasible.

That's sort of what we are trying to avoid, there's no way you will be getting/chasing/hunting links out for all 10k pages, BUT everyone will want to add that many.

Which (I think) will just fluff up our URL base, not really add any value. It takes me 2 minutes to add a deep url and categorize it.

i don't think you'd want the headache of trading/organizing all of your tags & categories. pick your most popular and SEO friendly sub-pages and start with those. add on from there once you've got some good deep linking going on in those main ones.

illamental wrote:i don't think you'd want the headache of trading/organizing all of your tags & categories. pick your most popular and SEO friendly sub-pages and start with those. add on from there once you've got some good deep linking going on in those main ones.

I didn't mean I wanted to link to tag and category pages on my blogs, I would be building deep links to actual blog posts... (Like a linkbait post that goes viral and gets many backlinks to it)


Right now, pages can only be organized by "Category" here in linkspun. If there was a better way than just "category", it would be easier to manage hundreds, if not thousands of pages to find trades for.

IE, a simple tagging system where we can assign our pages to a category, and then assign tags to them as well.

Examples:
SiteABC.com in category "Straight - Anal", tagged "Blog" "Handwritten"
Site-123.net in category "Gay - Twink", tagged "TGP"
bigtits.somefreehost.com in category "Straight - Tits", tagged "Blog" "Freehosted" "Subdomain"
blog.siteXYZ.com in category "Straight - Amateur", tagged "Blog" "Hosted" "Subdomain"


Then when searching, you can filter within a category by tag, showing only Blogs, or filtering out Freehosted or subdomains.

If a tagging system was in place, then deep link pages could be tagged accordingly and filtered by tag.

I understand the importance of deep linking, however this feature would complicate the simplicity of this service which is one of it's many advantages.

I dont see why you wouldnt add them one by one. If you`ll add 1000s or even just 100s at once there's no way you`ll get enough links to each to make your strategy effective.

mBishop wrote:

illamental wrote:i don't think you'd want the headache of trading/organizing all of your tags & categories. pick your most popular and SEO friendly sub-pages and start with those. add on from there once you've got some good deep linking going on in those main ones.

I didn't mean I wanted to link to tag and category pages on my blogs, I would be building deep links to actual blog posts... (Like a linkbait post that goes viral and gets many backlinks to it)


Right now, pages can only be organized by "Category" here in linkspun. If there was a better way than just "category", it would be easier to manage hundreds, if not thousands of pages to find trades for.

IE, a simple tagging system where we can assign our pages to a category, and then assign tags to them as well.

Examples:
SiteABC.com in category "Straight - Anal", tagged "Blog" "Handwritten"
Site-123.net in category "Gay - Twink", tagged "TGP"
bigtits.somefreehost.com in category "Straight - Tits", tagged "Blog" "Freehosted" "Subdomain"
blog.siteXYZ.com in category "Straight - Amateur", tagged "Blog" "Hosted" "Subdomain"


Then when searching, you can filter within a category by tag, showing only Blogs, or filtering out Freehosted or subdomains.

If a tagging system was in place, then deep link pages could be tagged accordingly and filtered by tag.