Was this a waste of money like I think it was

major48 · Post by **major48** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:44 pm

I bought some adult contextual backlinks from fiverr and I think they just gave me a bunch of worthless links that may hurt more than help. The links are to my site http://twerkflix.com. Here is a portion of the backlink report. Let me know what you think.

1 http://look-at-that.com/story.php?id=28263
2 http://birtheel6.listal.com/
3 http://nanowrimo.org/participants/clavepear7
4 http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/locketpoland5/
5 http://www.instructables.com/member/voiceappeal0/
6 http://media-monsta.com/profile/tiphouse8
7 http://moodle.epach.com.mx/user/view.ph ... 9&course=1
8 http://connect.syracuse.com/user/birthroast9/index.html
9 http://www.storenvy.com/voiceappeal3
10 http://www.wheretogetengaged.com/user/620109
11 http://picyou.com/user/locketrod3
12 http://datingsite-free.com/voicejoin8
13 http://www.foodspotting.com/1379921
14 http://www.fish-games.org/index.php?par ... ew/380251/
15 http://armorgames.com/user/voicehouse8
16 http://www.kuailequn.com/locketjaguar0
17 http://www.thisismarilyn.com/shipspleen2
18 http://www.defensegames.info/index.php? ... ew/493023/
19 http://www.minisnap.com/index.php?param ... ew/100272/
20 http://www.streetfire.net/profile/valleyjoin7.htm

moneyshot · Post by **moneyshot** » Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:41 pm

Just curious, what'd they charge you?

major48 · Post by **major48** » Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:33 pm

moneyshot wrote:Just curious, what'd they charge you?

Well it was over 3000 backlinks and contextual links for $140

moneyshot · Post by **moneyshot** » Sun Jan 12, 2014 11:33 pm

major48 wrote:
moneyshot wrote:Just curious, what'd they charge you?
Well it was over 3000 backlinks and contextual links for $140

Not seen a traffic increase yet?

I'm certainly no expert, but it may take some time for google to index those those links to payoff in PR. Just my guess.

Also I think I just read somewhere that placing too many back links at once (over 200) google will view it as spam and it could hurt you. But never believe anything you read. Nobody knows exactly how google works except for google.

That sounds like a nice price for 3000.

major48 · Post by **major48** » Sun Jan 12, 2014 11:55 pm

moneyshot wrote:
Not seen a traffic increase yet?

I'm certainly no expert, but it may take some time for google to index those those links to payoff in PR. Just my guess.

Also I think I just read somewhere that placing too many back links at once (over 200) google will view it as spam and it could hurt you. But never believe anything you read. Nobody knows exactly how google works except for google.

That sounds like a nice price for 3000.

Well I know it will take a while for Google to catch up but I was wondering were the links any good because they are not even on adult sites and they just seem to be so random.

moneyshot · Post by **moneyshot** » Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:03 am

major48 wrote:
moneyshot wrote:
Not seen a traffic increase yet?

I'm certainly no expert, but it may take some time for google to index those those links to payoff in PR. Just my guess.

Also I think I just read somewhere that placing too many back links at once (over 200) google will view it as spam and it could hurt you. But never believe anything you read. Nobody knows exactly how google works except for google.

That sounds like a nice price for 3000.
Well I know it will take a while for Google to catch up but I was wondering were the links any good because they are not even on adult sites and they just seem to be so random.

Honestly, I'm not sure if it matters or not, as long as you have some back links....but I wouldn't be surprised if google has a way of ranking them somehow....

Good luck, I hope you get some hits.

major48 · Post by **major48** » Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:21 am

And no I have not seen a traffic increase yet. I just got the links a few days ago

mcfester · Post by **mcfester** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:45 pm

Totally fucking useless, I'd remove them or use disavow before you get penalised.
I've posted about fiverr links before, as have others, they are great if you wanna send some negative seo to someone, but thats about it.
http://www.linkspun.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1562

Most of them links are forum profiles, not good, and to make things worse they have the same text so they just look like duplicate pages, a huge no no.
You should only use links like that to strengthen tier one links, not direct to your money site.
You might get away with it cos most of them links will never get indexed but I'd use disavow just to be safe.
Download this link checker and add the live links to disavow http://www.blackhatlinks.com/blackhatli ... hecker.php
And don't use that site for links also, just as bad as fiverr.

If you must use fiverr ask the seller to provide account info for the sites before you buy so you can remove the links yourself if it all goes to shit.
Why $140? Links like that should be $5, can you post the link for the fiverr gig?

major48 · Post by **major48** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm

mcfester wrote:Totally fucking useless, I'd remove them or use disavow before you get penalised.
I've posted about fiverr links before, as have others, they are great if you wanna send some negative seo to someone, but thats about it.
http://www.linkspun.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1562

Most of them links are forum profiles, not good, and to make things worse they have the same text so they just look like duplicate pages, a huge no no.
You should only use links like that to strengthen tier one links, not direct to your money site.
You might get away with it cos most of them links will never get indexed but I'd use disavow just to be safe.
Download this link checker and add the live links to disavow http://www.blackhatlinks.com/blackhatli ... hecker.php
And don't use that site for links also, just as bad as fiverr.

If you must use fiverr ask the seller to provide account info for the sites before you buy so you can remove the links yourself if it all goes to shit.
Why $140? Links like that should be $5, can you post the link for the fiverr gig?

Well it was 140 because I got the extras. http://fiverr.com/cjenny/create-250-con ... more-below

vrocks · Post by **vrocks** » Wed Jan 15, 2014 12:00 am

Those are what Google webmaster tools sends out noticed for saying, "It appears you have bought links or used some other form of obtaining links in a way that goes against our terms of service."

moneyshot · Post by **moneyshot** » Wed Jan 15, 2014 1:44 am

I wish I had access to a Chinese tech sweatshop of some sort...pay like $2.50/hr to have 50 dudes posting unique links and text to your sites all over the interwebz......

moneyshot · Post by **moneyshot** » Wed Jan 15, 2014 1:44 am

vrocks wrote:Those are what Google webmaster tools sends out noticed for saying, "It appears you have bought links or used some other form of obtaining links in a way that goes against our terms of service."

mcfester · Post by **mcfester** » Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:10 am

major48 wrote: Well it was 140 because I got the extras. http://fiverr.com/cjenny/create-250-con ... more-below

Sorry to say but you got well ripped off, theres gigs on there for 25k links for $5 http://fiverr.com/belkis333/25-000-xrum ... xrumer-gig

Have you left feedback yet? I think the only way to try get your money back is to try the resolution center, tell them there is no mention of the links being forum profiles that will do your site harm and they are not contextual as the gig states, use that link checker also so you can tell them how many are not live.
Failing that you can leave bad feedback and hope they offer to refund for removal of feedback, but seeing that its $140 instead of the usual $5 I'd expect them to just accept the bad feedback and keep the money.
Good luck.

mcfester · Post by **mcfester** » Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:14 am

moneyshot wrote:I wish I had access to a Chinese tech sweatshop of some sort...pay like $2.50/hr to have 50 dudes posting unique links and text to your sites all over the interwebz......

Thats what fiverr is for, to use Indians and Pakis

moneyshot · Post by **moneyshot** » Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:56 am

mcfester wrote:
moneyshot wrote:I wish I had access to a Chinese tech sweatshop of some sort...pay like $2.50/hr to have 50 dudes posting unique links and text to your sites all over the interwebz......
Thats what fiverr is for, to use Indians and Pakis

But I'd like to have a bunch of them working on my shit for only $2.50/hr for a whole fucking crew of like say, 100..... only as a private project making all unique posts and links. I'd want a webcam up in there so I could log-in and watch them MF's typing my shit up. All of them would be required to maintain 120wpm on that fucking keyboard too (or get docked in pay)......

On a side note, I'm working on my new gay tube and I'm about to fucking hire out someone to write the SEO copy .....I've got a bit of "writer's block" .I do think I'm going to need another hit (or two) to finish it.

Now don't get me wrong....I'm not hatin' on The Gays or anything, it's just that I don't roll like that and I'm having some conceptualization problems.....their money is just as green.

bbhrucy79 · Post by **bbhrucy79** » Sun Oct 26, 2014 1:19 am

yeah, it was a waste of money but imho if you dont disavow those links you will loose more than just money. Google "penguin" algo will definitely mark your site for suspicious backlinks - unnatural backlink profile. And lets be honest it is an unnatural backlink profile - unrelated to your site plus they came out of nowhere all out of a sudden. If I were you I would immediately disavow them. I mean only if Google traffic is dear to you... bottom line as always: shortcuts do not work

Linkspun.com

Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was

Re: Was this a waste of money like I think it was